1、我要进行一次辩论赛，关于全球化与环境的，英语
The processes that we now think of as “globalization” were central
to the environmental cause well before the term “globalization”
came into its current usage. Global environmental concerns were
born out of the recognition that ecological processes do not always
respect national boundaries and that environmental problems often
have impacts beyond borders; sometimes globally. Connected to
this was the notion that the ability of humans to act and think at a
global scale also brings with it a new dimension of global responsibility—
not only to planetary resources but also to planetary fairness.
These ideas were central to the defining discourse of contemporary
environmentalism in the 1960s and 1970s1 and to the
concept of sustainable development that took root in the 1980s and
1990s.2
The current debate on globalization has become de-linked from its
environmental roots and contexts. These links between environment
and globalization need to be re-examined and recognized. To
ignore these links is to misunderstand the full extent and nature of
globalization and to miss out on critical opportunities to address
some of the most pressing environmental challenges faced by
humanity. The purpose of this paper is to explore these linkages in
the context of the current discourse.
For its February 2007 meetings, the Global Ministerial
Environment Forum (GMEF) of the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) has selected environment and globalization as
one of its areas of focus. This paper has been prepared as an independent
input to that process. The thrust of the paper, therefore, is
on policy-relevant debates and its principal audience is environmental
leaders assembling in Nairobi, Kenya, for the GMEF meetings.
However, the paper aspires also to be relevant to audiences and
debates beyond this meeting. We hope that the paper will inspire
discussions—even if they are critical of our analysis—on the nature
and importance of the links between environment and globalization.
It is hoped that the discussions that will begin in Nairobi willnot end there—that these conversations will not only be carried
back to national capitals, but will also be carried forward by leaders
of government, international organizations, civil society and business.
We hope that this paper will contribute to a more vigorous
conversation on environment and globalization at Nairobi, and
beyond.
This paper has been proced independently by the International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) with financial support
from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of
Denmark. The process was led by David Runnalls (IISD’s President
and Chief Executive Officer) and Mark Halle (IISD’s Director of
Trade and Investment and European Representative). The principal
author is Prof. Adil Najam (IISD Associate and Associate Professor
at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University),
who was assisted in the research by Mihaela Papa and Lauren K.
Inouye.3
The paper has benefited tremendously from the insights and ideas
of an ad hoc advisory group that met twice in Geneva (October
2006 and January 2007). These meetings were attended by the
authors and researchers as well as by Hussein Abaza (Egypt), Tariq
Banuri (Pakistan), Susan Brown (Australia), Tom Burke (United
Kingdom), Kim Carstensen (Denmark), Marion Cheatle (United
Kingdom), Dharam Ghai (Kenya), Jean-Pierre Lehmann (France),
Kilaparti Ramakrishna (India/United States), Phillipe Roch
(Switzerland), Laurence Tubiana (France) and Dominic Waughray
(United Kingdom), all of whom inspired and shaped the ideas contained
here in countless ways. In addition, this paper has also benefited
from the advice and encouragement of Achim Steiner,
Executive Director of UNEP.We are also grateful to Aaron Cosbey
of IISD for providing very useful comments on the final draft.We
are especially grateful to Mihaela Papa and Lauren K. Inouye of the
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, for their
invaluable research assistance, and for their substantive and significant
contributions to the ideas contained here. The paper remains
a totally independent publication, and the views expressed here do
not necessarily represent the official position of either the
Government of Denmark or of UNEP.
Environment and
Globalization: Understanding
the Linkages
Although the contemporary debate on globalization has been contentious,
it has not always been useful. No one doubts that some
very significant global processes—economic, social, cultural, political
and environmental—are underway and that they affect (nearly)
everyone and (nearly) everything. Yet, there is no agreement on
exactly how to define this thing we call “globalization,” nor on
exactly which parts of it are good or bad, and for whom. For the
most part, a polarized view of globalization, its potential and its
pitfalls has taken hold of the public imagination. It has often been
projected either as a panacea for all the ills of the world or as their
primary cause. The discussion on the links between environment
and globalization has been similarly stuck in a quagmire of many
unjustified expectations and fears about the connections between
these two domains.
Box 1. Defining globalization.
What is Globalization?
There are nearly as many definitions of globalization as
authors who write on the subject. One review, by Scholte, provides
a classification of at least five broad sets of definitions:4
Globalization as internationalization. The “global” in globalization
is viewed “as simply another adjective to describe
cross-border relations between countries.” It describes the
growth in international exchange and interdependence.
Globalization as liberalization. Removing governmentimposed
restrictions on movements between countries.
Globalization as universalization. Process of spreading ideas
and experiences to people at all corners of the earth so thataspirations and experiences around the world become harmonized.
Globalization as westernization or modernization. The social
structures of modernity (capitalism, instrialism, etc.) are
spread the world over, destroying cultures and local self-determination
in the process.
Globalization as deterritorialization. Process of the “reconfiguration
of geography, so that social space is no longer wholly
mapped in terms of territorial places, territorial distances and
territorial borders.”
Although the debates on the definition and importance of globalization
have been vigorous over time, we believe that the truly relevant
policy questions today are about who benefits and who does
not; how the benefits and the costs of these processes can be shared
fairly; how the opportunities can be maximized by all; and how the
risks can be minimized.
In addressing these questions, one can understand globalization to
be a complex set of dynamics offering many opportunities to better
the human condition, but also involving significant potential
threats. Contemporary globalization manifests itself in various
ways, three of which are of particular relevance to policy-makers.
They also comprise significant environmental opportunities and
risks.
1. Globalization of the economy. The world economy globalizes
as national economies integrate into the international economy
through trade; foreign direct investment; short-term capital
flows; international movement of workers and people in general;
and flows of technology.5 This has created new opportunities
for many; but not for all. It has also placed pressures on the
global environment and on natural resources, straining the
capacity of the environment to sustain itself and exposing
human dependence on our environment.6 A globalized economy
can also proce globalized externalities and enhance global
inequities.7 Local environmental and economic decisions cancontribute to global solutions and prosperity, but the environmental
costs, as well as the economic ramifications of our
actions, can be externalized to places and people who are so far
away as to seem invisible.
2. Globalization of knowledge. As economies open up, more
people become involved in the processes of knowledge integration
and the deepening of non-market connections, including
flows of information, culture, ideology and technology.8 New
technologies can solve old problems, but they can also create
new ones. Technologies of environmental care can move across
boundaries quicker, but so can technologies of environmental
extraction. Information flows can connect workers and citizens
across boundaries and oceans (e.g., the
rise of global social movements as well
as of outsourcing), but they can also
threaten social and economic networks
at the local level. Environmentalism as a
norm has become truly global, but so
has mass consumerism.
3. Globalization of governance. Globalization places great stress
on existing patterns of global governance with the shrinking of
both time and space; the expanding role of non-state actors;
and the increasingly complex inter-state interactions.9 The
global nature of the environment demands global environmental
governance, and indeed a worldwide infrastructure of international
agreements and institutions has emerged and continues
to grow.10 But many of today’s global environmental problems
have outgrown the governance systems designed to solve
them.11 Many of these institutions, however, struggle as they
have to respond to an ever-increasing set of global challenges
while remaining constrained by institutional design principles
inherited from an earlier, more state-centric world.
The relationship between the environment and globalization—
although often overlooked—is critical to both domains.12 The environment
itself is inherently global, with life-sustaining ecosystems
and watersheds frequently crossing national boundaries; air pollution
moving across entire continents and oceans; and a singleshared atmosphere providing climate protection and shielding us
from harsh UV rays.Monitoring and responding to environmental
issues frequently provokes a need for coordinated global or regional
governance. Moreover, the environment is intrinsically linked to
economic development, providing natural resources that fuel
growth and ecosystem services that underpin both life and livelihoods.
Indeed, at least one author suggests that “the economy is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the ecology.”13
While the importance of the relationship between globalization and
the environment is obvious, our understanding of how these twin
dynamics interact remains weak. Much of the literature on globalization
and the environment is vague (discussing generalities);
myopic (focused disproportionately only on trade-related connections);
and/or partial (highlighting the impacts of globalization on
the environment, but not the other way around).
It is important to highlight that not only does globalization impact
the environment, but the environment impacts the pace, direction
and quality of globalization. At the very least, this happens because
environmental resources provide the fuel for economic globalization,
but also because our social and policy responses to global environmental
challenges constrain and influence the context in which
globalization happens. This happens, for example, through the governance
structures we establish and through the constellation of
stakeholders and stakeholder interests
that construct key policy debates. It
also happens through the transfer of
social norms, aspirations and ideas
that criss-cross the globe to formulate
extant and emergent social movements,
including global environmentalism.
In short, not only are the environment
and globalization intrinsically linked,
they are so deeply welded together
that we simply cannot address the
global environmental challenges facing us unless we are able to
understand and harness the dynamics of globalization that influ-ence them. By the same token, those who wish to capitalize on the
potential of globalization will not be able to do so unless they are
able to understand and address the great environmental challenges
of our time, which are part of the context within which globalization
takes place.
Table 1. Environment and globalization: some examples of interaction.
2、全球化对中国影响好坏辩论赛
开头： 全球化是一个以经济全球化为核心、包含各国各民族各地区在政治、文化、科技、军事、安全、意识形态、生活方式、价值观念等多层次、多领域的相互联系、影响、制约的多元概念。“全球化”可概括为科技、经济、政治、法治、管理、组织、文化、思想观念、人际交往、国际关系十个方面的全球化。
观点：
就全球化的必然性而言，随着当今世界联系的越来越紧密全球化已经成为不可忽视的一个趋势。就全球化的必要性而言，全球化有利于每个国家之间的交流和发展。所以我方认为全球化对中国的发展是非常有好处的。
3、高分求一篇经济全球化利与弊的英文作文。
下面是一篇经济全球化利与弊的中英文对照的作文：
文化多样性的减少
一、全球化会抹平社会间的多样性，但会增加社会内部的多样性。因为人们可供选择的菜单增加了。想想哪个更重要。
二、多样性是一个悖论。全球化确实会使某些局部上的多样性减少。太多的知识会限制我们的创造力。某种程度的隔绝可以将自信和某种魔术感注入到艺术中。这种局部多样性的减少又意味着人们可供选择的菜单的减少。
三、这是一个“度”的问题。
First, globalization will smooth out the diversity among the community, but will increase the diversity within society. Because people increased choice of menu. Think about which is more important.
Second, diversity is a paradox. Globalization does make some partial rection of diversity. Too much knowledge will limit our creativity. Some
degree of isolation can inject a sense of confidence and a certain magic to the art. This diversity of local people to rece the mean rection in choice of menu.
Third, this is a "degree" of the problem.
传统节日渐渐被西方节日占领，传统习俗的遗忘，传统古建筑在经济的发展下不断被拆除摧毁。
The traditional festival has graally been occupied by Western festivals, traditions and customs be forgotten, the traditional ancient buildings continue to be demolished to destroy in the development of the economy.
People in the world today are facing complicated society. Art and culture even be used to achieve the expansion. Hollywood, United States, for example, Hollywood annually proces about 700 films the Hollywood audience all over the world. In fact, the Hollywood movie has now become a tool of the United States to achieve the purposes of aggression and expansion.
文化既是民族的，又是世界的
各民族都有自己文化的个性和特征。 各民族文化都是世界文化中不可缺少
Culture is national, but also the world's
All ethnic groups have their own culture and personality characteristics. The national culture is indispensable to world culture
Accounted for over 1/5 of the population lives in countries with the highest income levels, they have 86% of the global gross domestic proct (GDP), 82% of the global export market, 68% of the foreign direct investment, 74% of the total number of telephone; while the share of the world's populationonly about 1% of the share of 1/5 of the total number of poor in the above-mentioned items now. The difference between rich and poor countries in terms of average income, 74 times, in 1960, this gap is only 30 times. In addition, the 200 richest assets accounted for 41% of the world's total population, more than the total income.
200 millionaire property increased twice in the past four years, more than one trillion U.S. dollars, to the contrary, the daily income of less than $ poor remained at around 1.3 billion.
Globalization undoubtedly contributed to the overall growth of the world
economy, the global distribution of economic interests is disproportionate. A handful of national and multinational monopolies rules of the game and control the world market. Multinational corporations are an important driving force of economic globalization, the world's 100 largest economies, and yet there are 51 multinational companies. (2000 data) and the vast majority of multinational companies from developed countries. Seen by the state power embodied in national wealth gap is still huge. In economic output, few countries are expected to challenge the middle or even smaller instrialized countries. Even the third world to maintain the momentum of rapid development, the absolute gap can be so large that in the foreseeable future is unlikely to be eliminated.
At present, the persons concerned are to promote economic globalization on developed countries' damage theory. "However, the world economy and the greater impact of the international system is globalization has increased
inequality between countries. First, the past accumulated inequalities between countries not only failed to eliminate or mitigate a result of globalization, but growing.
Population of high-income countries account for only about 15% of the world's population, their home is the world's biological capacity by 28% but 55% of global consumption of biocapacity. This is how to achieve it?
However, political independence, economic independence they are still
nowhere in sight. International division of labor under globalization, third world countries are still at the bottom of the global instrial chain, excessive
consumption in developed countries to provide the resources and cheap labor.
An indigenous leader from the Philippines has sharply pointed out that "the so-called economic globalization, but the latest manifestation of colonialism." Colonial past is a direct plunder, colonists had to directly face the dissatisfaction of the colonists and resistance; the current economic
globalization is the scam together, the old masters and the elite conspiracy third World countries, third World countries continue to proce low-cost output, raw materials and labor (in processing, etc.), and in exchange, often and interests of the majority of unrelated or even negatively related to luxury goods and weapons and the like. "
In 1964, the world-renowned U.S. company Union Carbide in India opened a proction of pesticides farm .1975 years, finally built a large Pesticide Factory, 750 kilometers south away from the capital city of New Delhi.
In the 1984, this Pesticide Factory, liquid, highly toxic gas leakage from the tank, and lingering. The accident put 45 tons of highly toxic gas inside the tank to leak away. Only two days alone, more than 2,500 people were killed and another 60 million people affected by the poison damage of varying degrees. In 1994,The number of death has reached 6495 , there are 40,000 people dying.
Globalization the values conflict, main performance for different nationalities and countries, especially between the values of western values and non-western values of the conflict between.
And for non-western behind countries, western values and the conflict between the national values and is often and traditional values and the modem values is the process of modernization, the formation and development of the conflict between the values and intertwined, and often with the latter for intermediary.
Although "globalization" and "modernization" have different content, the former has some kind of space or geographic category of nature, it is to point to from regional to global;
While the latter has some time or historical category of nature, it is to point to from tradition to modern times, but since modern times of globalization and the whole world of modernization process is actually the same process.
It is in this process, the western capitalist countries to take the lead in realizing the
modernization of the endogenous type, according to the capitalist expansion immanent logic and with its start advantage, forced or sece non-western national identity western value, tries hard to western values, a generalized and globalization;
Some non-western countries the hand behind efforts to start or DuoCi start forced type, such as the modernization of the ZhuiGanXing exogenous type, and thus in different degree approbation west value, on the other hand, a generalized expansion in western values under the weight of national culture and appear constantly identity crisis and identity pursuit, and national cultural identity in the final analysis or for the ethnic traditional culture, especially to the core value of identity.
Therefore, in the globalization of the world modernization and basic collocated process, "" western" is no longer a geographical term but 'common code of', 'modern western' is' the symbol of modernization "universal. Through such conversion, identity 'western' into identity 'modern'."
J correspondingly, globalization china-africa western countries face behind the national values and the western the conflicts of values, often also direct the performance for the traditional values and the modem values of the conflict between.
As the expansion of the generalized to western values and fight against extreme form of response, fundamentalism was "the modern", lies in its saw and special emphasis on globalization in the modern values and the exterior-interior relationship between western values.
Also because of this, so native and outland, traditional and modern this two category and their mutual relationships become the contemporary culture study and cultural philosophy in the debate a focal point.
In the face of all these contemporary globalization in complex culture values conflict, cultural evolution in different cultural and understand that values will geographic category (native and outland) into historical category (the traditional and modern), and cultural relativism then requires the people will historical category (the traditional and modern) into geographic category (native and outlands).
Although cultural evolution and cultural relativism each has its drawbacks, of which, the former have obviously the theory of color, the latter has the cultural conservatism properties, but both see the modern globalization in different national values, especially the conflict between western values and non-western values is the conflict between the traditional values and the modem values and the conflict is profoundly intertwined with the facts, and to make a fact to own understanding and explanation.
增加是随着经济全球化的正常运作过程而产生的，它同时又是全球化发展不均衡的结果。 With the globalization of economy increase is the normal operation of the process and of generation, it is also the result of the unbalanced development of globalization.
全球化带来的收益与支付的成本在不同的国家之间和一国之内不同人群之间的分配也是不均衡的。
The benefits of globalization and the cost of pay in different countries and different groups within one country between the distribution is not balanced between.
也就是说发达国家和发展中国家在全球化发展中参与游戏的角色是不同的，所获得的利益是不
That is the developed countries and developing countries in global development in the game role is different, benefit from is not
均衡的，这样的倾斜导致了发展中国家大量的非法移民流入发达国家
A balanced, so the tilt of the developing countries in a large number of illegal immigrants into
the developed countries
4、怎样看待全球化对文化的影响 英语
随着全球化时代的到来，外来文化对中国市场的强烈冲击、西方文化大举扩张，外国文化产品不断挤占中国文化市场，征服中国的文化受众，使中国文化面临削弱自身特色、倾向西化的现实威胁，在理论上对西方文化理论进行话语平移，在创作上对西方文化创作模式进行模仿和复制，由此甚至使西方文化对我国所进行的文化霸权得到部分实现，对当代中国民族精神产生重大的冲击和威胁，抑制了中国文化合理功能的充分发挥。全球化给中国文化带来的压力还体现在中国文化进行国际参与、实现国际化发展方面的重重困难和阻力。
中国传统文化遭遇了市场经济的时代洗礼，导致传统文化架构的崩溃和新的文化孕育和诞生自然经济的可控性、自足性、低效率，与市场经济的非控性、开放性，高效率，是根本对立的。中国文化似乎处于从没有过的质疑、惶恐、浮躁和迷茫之中。
传统文化生存艰难。当今世界来势汹涌的全球文化一体化、同质化过程，其实质就是向现代西方高科技文化趋同、被西方高科技文化同化的过程。一些人对自己文化传统的反省几乎到了自虐的程度。几十年来我们对自己的传统文化批判多于继承，否定多于肯定，缺少认真的总结，更遑论普及。很多中国传统文化在国人的心目中的忘却速度令人吃惊，对文化问题的质疑却日益弥漫，中国传统文化的主流正面临无以为继的危机。
历史在演变，食物在变化，理论由发展，文艺的精典也在不断扩大、重构和完善，传统的审美内涵也在有着当代意识的当代人的重新阐释下而另具新意。中国文学艺术虽然在近一百年里深受西方文学艺术的影响，但因其固守自身规律而长期循着自身的发展逻辑，在理论方法上变化不大。经过历史的洗礼，国人借助西方文化研究的理论视角来分析研究世纪末和新世纪初的中国文学艺术的方法逐渐扩大。在全球化的大背景下，中国文艺正处在东西方文化互动的冲突与融合当中，中国的文学艺术理论工作者肩负历史的重任，承担起了继承发展中国发展文化的重任，在理论上建构和完善中华民族的优秀文化，使之在世界大的变革之中立于不败的地位。
中国传统文化是具有悠久历史的文化，为世界文化的丰富和发展做出了杰出的贡献。在全球化文化的背景下，中国文化的发展，需要我们理性的看待自身的文化传统，处理好民族性与时代性的关系；也需要我们理性的面对他者的文明，处理好本土文化与全球化的关系。
5、经济全球化对发展中国家的不利影响(本人要参加辩论赛，越详细越好)
越长越好啊……
首先，比较浅表的原因
经济全球化使发展中国家成为发达国家的产品加工厂，并且发达国家将污染严重的重工业转移至发展中国家，造成发展中国家的环境污染，所以对发展中国家不利。
其次……
算了，既然你要求越长越好，那么你要的应该只是资料，给你转帖一篇吧：
经济全球化就对于发展中国家而言就是经济侵略，你想我们鸦片战争后的不平等条约，除了赔款外，就是开国门自由贸易了，这就是经济全球化啊。全球化后，大品牌的公司将工厂设在发展中国家，将发展中国家变成原料产地和劳力提供地。生产的产品返销回去，这样利润就非常大了。发展中国家如果不渐进地提高民族工业，就是沦为新时期的经济殖民地。
当然像亚洲的一些国家因为有工业基础，同时政府也不断发展民族工业，对外的开放也是有限制性的，得到了很多好处，比如中国。但是正如郎咸平教授说的，发达国家掌握了商品的产业链的绝大部分，比如品牌、物流（航运）、金融服务、资金、技术等等，发展中国家就掌握了生产这个环节，如何取得整个产业链的利益分配权，最后，比如100的利润，分给我们是5，其他他们分，你说合理吗？同时我们还要承担环保的代价，并且他们还要通过金融来蚕食我们拿的那5的利润，举个例子就是97亚洲金融危机，就是发达国家对东南亚的金融攻击。还有日本，日本的80年代经济经济状况和我国现在多像啊，现在呢，怎样了啊，已经停滞了接近10几年了，为什么啊，就是美欧国家对于日本进行了一次金融攻击啊，搜索一下“日本 广场协议”你就非常明白了。
其实经济全球化的不利不但在于对于参与经济全球化的国家的利益分配的不公，并且在于参与经济全球化的国家内部人民间的利益分配不公。这是一次对于全球财富的一次重新分配，使得发达国家的富人和发展中国家的有先天条件的人（掌握权力和一些有远见的人）都取得了非常大的利益，使得发达国家的产业工人失业增多，因为他们的工作有发展中国家的工人代替了，这样发达国家的中产阶层减少，同时发展中国家的富人更富，权贵勾结一起发达，穷人更穷（这些都是相对而言，社会财富是大量增加了的，不过分配时富人拿的更多），最终就会破坏经济结构和社会公平，所以现在很多已经意识到了这点，主张经济全球化的新自由主义开始没落，美国的民主党执政，日本的自民党下台表明新自由主义的没落。比如美国，奥巴马是民主党，支持民主党的是中小企业和工会力量，这些都是代表中下层利益的，全球化对大的跨国公司很有利，相应的中小企业就不是很有利，所以贸易保护主义又有点抬头了，什么轮胎特保案啊都来了。
==========
希望对你有帮助
6、辩论赛经济全球化利弊
开头： 全球化是一个以经济全球化为核心、包含各国各民族各地区在政治、文化、科技、军事、安全、意识形态、生活方式、价值观念等多层次、多领域的相互联系、影响、制约的多元概念。“全球化”可概括为科技、经济、政治、法治、管理、组织、文化、思想观念、人际交往、国际关系十个方面的全球化。
观点：
就全球化的必然性而言，随着当今世界联系的越来越紧密全球化已经成为不可忽视的一个趋势。就全球化的必要性而言，全球化有利于每个国家之间的交流和发展。所以我方认为全球化对中国的发展是非常有好处的。
7、英语辩论演讲稿
下面是我整理的英语 辩论 演讲稿 ，希望对大家有帮助。
英语辩论演讲稿1：
I shall at tempt to convince you that the place of women is in the home. The family is the unit of society and the mother is the center of the family. How can the family keep together if the mother is out at work all day?
The government recognizes the need for women to be in the home by giving taxation concessions for the housewife.Every year, we also celebrate Mother~ s Day with gifts and with songs and poems praising motherhood.
It can be seen that with the accelerating deterioration eviden in family life today, the time is not far distant when,with the disappearance of the family, the human race will cease to exist.
In any case, women prefer to be at home. No person really wants to work. To be able to sit at home and gossip or read is every woman's ambition. It would be a kindness to forbid women to work outside the home.
From these arguments, there can be no doubt that society is best served when women are compelled to stay at home and look after their children.
我要试图说服大家：女人的位置是在家里。家庭是社会的单位，而母亲是家庭的中心。如果母亲整天在外面工作，家庭还怎么聚拢呢?
政府意识到妇女在家中是必不可少的，所以给家庭主妇做出减少纳税的优惠政策。每年，我们还要献迹神上礼物、颂歌、诗词庆祝 母亲节 来赞美为母之道。
我们可以看到今天家庭生活明显地日趋解体，过不了多久，随着家庭的消亡，人类也将不复存在。
不清耐管怎么说，女人还是乐意在家里呆着。没有人会真的想工作。能坐在家里聊聊天，看看书是每个女人最大的愿望。不允许妇女在家里以外的地方工作真是一大恩赐。
从这些论点来看，妇女被迫呆在家里看孩管家，受益最大的无疑是社会。
英姿正亏语辩论演讲稿2：
No matter which side of the couple don't wish other side to own privacy and these will make one side feel so anguished who one side is not trusted by the other side.I think that there should not be privacy between the couple.As to say the privacy,namely the secrets which can be told to nobody and thus may be doubted with the loyalty.Under these circumstances,there should not exist privacy.As the couple are incorporated,the privacy will expose someday just like deceiving oneself.Thus must broke the emotion between the couple.Therefore,no matter which side of the couple should be lenient and stand at the position of the other side to fulfill each side,as a result,privacy won't happen.
无论夫妻哪一方肯定不希望对方有隐私，那样感觉自己不被人信任，会很苦恼的 我觉得夫妻之间不应该有隐私，所谓隐私，既是不可告人的秘密，那一定是有被质问忠诚的嫌疑，既然如此，就不应该存在隐私。
既然夫妻以为一体，对方有隐私就如掩耳盗铃一样，终会有暴露的一天，那岂不是很伤感情?所以，不论是夫妻哪一方都应宽容大度，对对方提的问题要站在对方的立场上，尽量满足，所以也就不会在有隐私发生。
英语辩论演讲稿3：
Good morning， chairman, Ladies and gentlemen, my dear debaters. For the proposition that emigration trend is good or bad for the development of china. Emigration indicates people who leave their own country to go and live permanently in another country, here including Chinese go out and other foreign come to china.
As we all know that emigration has become a trend because of the globalization.
Our side firmly believes that emigration trend is good for the development of china. There are four reasons to support our point.
1引进外资，促进中国经济的发展中国国内有3000多万归侨侨眷，海外有几千万华人华侨，此为中国经济发展的一大优势。据不完全统计，改革开放以来，侨资占中国吸收外资总额的70%左右，海外华侨华人向中国公益事业捐款达400亿元人民币，仅2005年中国接受的海外移民汇款便达213亿美元，世界排名仅次于印度
First of all, it can bring foreign investment in order to promote China's economic development. There are over 30 million returned overseas Chinese and thousands of Chinese all over the world. They are introcing foreign investment, promoting the development of china’s economy and it became a strong advantage to the Chinese economy. Since reform and opening up, the overseas investment is about 70% of total foreign investment. The donation from returned overseas Chinese is about 40 billion Yuan. In 2005, the money donated from overseas is more than $ 21.3 billion, rank only second to India in the world.2 引进国外高新科技 提高自主创新能力，从而提高综合国力。
自主创新已被公认为推动企业、国家经济发展的主要动力来源。 上海市人大代表李逸平说：“提倡自主创新，并不是说全部从头开始，完全依靠自己的力量，而是强调在开放前提下的创新。能够跟外国先进技术嫁接的，我们可以在引进之后进行集成创新。而引进国外高新科技的最终目的就是实现自主创新。
自主创新让企业迸发出惊人的力量。上海著名的上海振华港口机械(集团)股份有限公司，凭借20多项领先世界的核心技术，已经连续多年占据全球市场的大半江山， 30万美元起家的微创医疗器械公司，研发 出国 内第一个具有完全自主知识产权的冠脉药物支架，首次进入垄断的日欧市场。Secondly, it can Introce foreign higher technology, promote the independent creativity, and improve comprehensive national power.Independent creativity is known as the main driving force to the economic development. Li nipin, NPC member in Shanghai, said, ‘’we call for independent creativity not means do everything from beginning and just by ourselves’ power, we can use foreign higher technology to help reach the final goal that independent creativity become the reality. 3.引进国外的人才到中国，促进中国发展
中国外专局局长季允石透露，2011年中国大力引进国外高层次人才和紧缺人才。要大力引进国外先进 种植 、养殖技术和生产经营方式，提升中国农业发展水平。着力引进发展先进装备制造、企业技术改造和现代服务业等方面的高层次人才。推广低炭技术，重点引进控制温室气体排放、资源有效利用和绿色节能等方面的外国专家。
中国外专局提供的数据显示，5年来，中国共引进境外专家230万人次，其中经济领域约159.6万人次，教科文卫和其他社会发展领域约69.6万人次，为中国经济的全面发展增添了动力。
Thirdly, it can introce foreign talent to China in order to develop our country.季允石 Ji Yunshi, The director general of SAFEA(外专局)said that, China introced the high level foreign talent and shortage talented person in 2011. In 2012 China continue to introce the foreign talent to inject new ideas and high technology for improving our agriculture, instry and service.
The data of SAFEA s in recent 5 years, china had introced 2300000 foreign experts.159600 of these experts are in the economic area and 69600 are in science, ecation culture and health area. These foreign talents bring power to Chinese economy.
4.把中国优秀 文化 弘扬到国外华侨华人通过遍及世界的中餐馆传播中华美食，通过会馆社团传播儒家思想，通过兴建华文学校、创办华文报刊、出版华文书籍将中国语言文学传播异域。华侨华人实为中华 传统文化 的载体与传播者。
中国政府真的不需要过于忧虑，首先移民是一个全球化的趋势，即使他人不在中国，同样可以宣传中国文化，以蔡志忠为例，他是台湾知名的漫画家，现在生活在加拿大，但他仍然在中国发表作品;其次中国、加拿大两国交替地生活更利于传递文化，范立欣到加拿大后有了更广阔的视野，如今回到中国拍摄的作品有其独特的风格，这对中国来说是好事;最后我要说的是移民后更便于他们传播中国文化。”last but not least, the oversea Chinese can spread our Chinese culture to the foreigners by living in the foreign country. Most of the oversea Chinese run some Chinese restaurants, so they can spread the Chinese food in this way. Our government doesn’t need to worry about it too much, and emigration has become global trend, although Chinese emigrations are not in china, but they used their own way to make contribution to china. Take caizhong –a famous cartoonist of Taiwan as an example, now he is in Canada, but he still published his works in china. And that is good for communication of culture.
That is all we want to say. Thank you..
富人移民，除了能够开启高质量的生活，追求更高层次的物质精神文明，同时，绝大多数移民者本身仅仅是获得一个海外通行证，主要的工作和事业还是集中在中国。毕竟，当前中国的高速发展，具备的广阔机遇空间，已经吸引大量的外籍人士以及海外华侨到中国投资创业，所以，富人即使移民到海外，发展的重心还是在中国。对于移民者而言，既获取了移民身份，开启高层生活，又实现了投资盈利，更重要的是，为祖国的经济金融稳定做出了积极的贡献。总之，中国的富人移民，实际上在更大程度上实现了个人价值和社会价值的有机统一，除了能够提高自己的层次地位，更重要的是，为中国的经济发展作出积极贡献!
对于“精英”和“新富阶层”移民，用“人才流动”比用“人才流失”形容更为准确。出国移民所导致的“人才流失”其实并没有 传说 中的那么夸张。移民中，有一些人才原本就没有流出，大部分事业的重心仍然在中国;而海外 留学 和工作的海归人才，事实“回流”的比例在提升。据 教育 部网站数据显示，各类留学回国人员总数目前有一半留学生是选择学成之后回国发展。“现在回流非常明显。与其中国的高等院校是美国大学的出国预备基地，我们为什么不把美国包括其他教育发达的国家，当作我们中国的博士或博士后的培养基地呢 ”移民专家认为，应该以一种更加开放的理念对待出国留学和移民。
“绝对是目前世界上数量最大、损失最多的人才流失国”。
就绝对规模而言，中国人才的外流数量的确称冠全球，可这首先是因为中国人口基数庞大。评价一种人口趋势，我们需要观察目标群体及其对应总体的关系。这就好比估算一个分数，要看分子，也要看分母。利用世界银行发布的最新数据，法国学者多克尔(Frédéric Docquier)等人计算了各国人口流入发达国家的比率。他们发现，2000年以前，仅有3.1%受过高等教育的中国人在22岁后迁移到了发达国家。中国的人才外流率在193个国家中位居第158位，同样是人口大国的印度还略高于中国(3.4%)。几十个非洲和拉美国家的外流率都在20%以上，它们才是发展经济学家关注的“问题国家”。