1、我要進行一次辯論賽，關於全球化與環境的，英語
The processes that we now think of as 「globalization」 were central
to the environmental cause well before the term 「globalization」
came into its current usage. Global environmental concerns were
born out of the recognition that ecological processes do not always
respect national boundaries and that environmental problems often
have impacts beyond borders; sometimes globally. Connected to
this was the notion that the ability of humans to act and think at a
global scale also brings with it a new dimension of global responsibility—
not only to planetary resources but also to planetary fairness.
These ideas were central to the defining discourse of contemporary
environmentalism in the 1960s and 1970s1 and to the
concept of sustainable development that took root in the 1980s and
1990s.2
The current debate on globalization has become de-linked from its
environmental roots and contexts. These links between environment
and globalization need to be re-examined and recognized. To
ignore these links is to misunderstand the full extent and nature of
globalization and to miss out on critical opportunities to address
some of the most pressing environmental challenges faced by
humanity. The purpose of this paper is to explore these linkages in
the context of the current discourse.
For its February 2007 meetings, the Global Ministerial
Environment Forum (GMEF) of the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) has selected environment and globalization as
one of its areas of focus. This paper has been prepared as an independent
input to that process. The thrust of the paper, therefore, is
on policy-relevant debates and its principal audience is environmental
leaders assembling in Nairobi, Kenya, for the GMEF meetings.
However, the paper aspires also to be relevant to audiences and
debates beyond this meeting. We hope that the paper will inspire
discussions—even if they are critical of our analysis—on the nature
and importance of the links between environment and globalization.
It is hoped that the discussions that will begin in Nairobi willnot end there—that these conversations will not only be carried
back to national capitals, but will also be carried forward by leaders
of government, international organizations, civil society and business.
We hope that this paper will contribute to a more vigorous
conversation on environment and globalization at Nairobi, and
beyond.
This paper has been proced independently by the International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) with financial support
from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of
Denmark. The process was led by David Runnalls (IISD』s President
and Chief Executive Officer) and Mark Halle (IISD』s Director of
Trade and Investment and European Representative). The principal
author is Prof. Adil Najam (IISD Associate and Associate Professor
at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University),
who was assisted in the research by Mihaela Papa and Lauren K.
Inouye.3
The paper has benefited tremendously from the insights and ideas
of an ad hoc advisory group that met twice in Geneva (October
2006 and January 2007). These meetings were attended by the
authors and researchers as well as by Hussein Abaza (Egypt), Tariq
Banuri (Pakistan), Susan Brown (Australia), Tom Burke (United
Kingdom), Kim Carstensen (Denmark), Marion Cheatle (United
Kingdom), Dharam Ghai (Kenya), Jean-Pierre Lehmann (France),
Kilaparti Ramakrishna (India/United States), Phillipe Roch
(Switzerland), Laurence Tubiana (France) and Dominic Waughray
(United Kingdom), all of whom inspired and shaped the ideas contained
here in countless ways. In addition, this paper has also benefited
from the advice and encouragement of Achim Steiner,
Executive Director of UNEP.We are also grateful to Aaron Cosbey
of IISD for providing very useful comments on the final draft.We
are especially grateful to Mihaela Papa and Lauren K. Inouye of the
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, for their
invaluable research assistance, and for their substantive and significant
contributions to the ideas contained here. The paper remains
a totally independent publication, and the views expressed here do
not necessarily represent the official position of either the
Government of Denmark or of UNEP.
Environment and
Globalization: Understanding
the Linkages
Although the contemporary debate on globalization has been contentious,
it has not always been useful. No one doubts that some
very significant global processes—economic, social, cultural, political
and environmental—are underway and that they affect (nearly)
everyone and (nearly) everything. Yet, there is no agreement on
exactly how to define this thing we call 「globalization,」 nor on
exactly which parts of it are good or bad, and for whom. For the
most part, a polarized view of globalization, its potential and its
pitfalls has taken hold of the public imagination. It has often been
projected either as a panacea for all the ills of the world or as their
primary cause. The discussion on the links between environment
and globalization has been similarly stuck in a quagmire of many
unjustified expectations and fears about the connections between
these two domains.
Box 1. Defining globalization.
What is Globalization?
There are nearly as many definitions of globalization as
authors who write on the subject. One review, by Scholte, provides
a classification of at least five broad sets of definitions:4
Globalization as internationalization. The 「global」 in globalization
is viewed 「as simply another adjective to describe
cross-border relations between countries.」 It describes the
growth in international exchange and interdependence.
Globalization as liberalization. Removing governmentimposed
restrictions on movements between countries.
Globalization as universalization. Process of spreading ideas
and experiences to people at all corners of the earth so thataspirations and experiences around the world become harmonized.
Globalization as westernization or modernization. The social
structures of modernity (capitalism, instrialism, etc.) are
spread the world over, destroying cultures and local self-determination
in the process.
Globalization as deterritorialization. Process of the 「reconfiguration
of geography, so that social space is no longer wholly
mapped in terms of territorial places, territorial distances and
territorial borders.」
Although the debates on the definition and importance of globalization
have been vigorous over time, we believe that the truly relevant
policy questions today are about who benefits and who does
not; how the benefits and the costs of these processes can be shared
fairly; how the opportunities can be maximized by all; and how the
risks can be minimized.
In addressing these questions, one can understand globalization to
be a complex set of dynamics offering many opportunities to better
the human condition, but also involving significant potential
threats. Contemporary globalization manifests itself in various
ways, three of which are of particular relevance to policy-makers.
They also comprise significant environmental opportunities and
risks.
1. Globalization of the economy. The world economy globalizes
as national economies integrate into the international economy
through trade; foreign direct investment; short-term capital
flows; international movement of workers and people in general;
and flows of technology.5 This has created new opportunities
for many; but not for all. It has also placed pressures on the
global environment and on natural resources, straining the
capacity of the environment to sustain itself and exposing
human dependence on our environment.6 A globalized economy
can also proce globalized externalities and enhance global
inequities.7 Local environmental and economic decisions cancontribute to global solutions and prosperity, but the environmental
costs, as well as the economic ramifications of our
actions, can be externalized to places and people who are so far
away as to seem invisible.
2. Globalization of knowledge. As economies open up, more
people become involved in the processes of knowledge integration
and the deepening of non-market connections, including
flows of information, culture, ideology and technology.8 New
technologies can solve old problems, but they can also create
new ones. Technologies of environmental care can move across
boundaries quicker, but so can technologies of environmental
extraction. Information flows can connect workers and citizens
across boundaries and oceans (e.g., the
rise of global social movements as well
as of outsourcing), but they can also
threaten social and economic networks
at the local level. Environmentalism as a
norm has become truly global, but so
has mass consumerism.
3. Globalization of governance. Globalization places great stress
on existing patterns of global governance with the shrinking of
both time and space; the expanding role of non-state actors;
and the increasingly complex inter-state interactions.9 The
global nature of the environment demands global environmental
governance, and indeed a worldwide infrastructure of international
agreements and institutions has emerged and continues
to grow.10 But many of today』s global environmental problems
have outgrown the governance systems designed to solve
them.11 Many of these institutions, however, struggle as they
have to respond to an ever-increasing set of global challenges
while remaining constrained by institutional design principles
inherited from an earlier, more state-centric world.
The relationship between the environment and globalization—
although often overlooked—is critical to both domains.12 The environment
itself is inherently global, with life-sustaining ecosystems
and watersheds frequently crossing national boundaries; air pollution
moving across entire continents and oceans; and a singleshared atmosphere providing climate protection and shielding us
from harsh UV rays.Monitoring and responding to environmental
issues frequently provokes a need for coordinated global or regional
governance. Moreover, the environment is intrinsically linked to
economic development, providing natural resources that fuel
growth and ecosystem services that underpin both life and livelihoods.
Indeed, at least one author suggests that 「the economy is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the ecology.」13
While the importance of the relationship between globalization and
the environment is obvious, our understanding of how these twin
dynamics interact remains weak. Much of the literature on globalization
and the environment is vague (discussing generalities);
myopic (focused disproportionately only on trade-related connections);
and/or partial (highlighting the impacts of globalization on
the environment, but not the other way around).
It is important to highlight that not only does globalization impact
the environment, but the environment impacts the pace, direction
and quality of globalization. At the very least, this happens because
environmental resources provide the fuel for economic globalization,
but also because our social and policy responses to global environmental
challenges constrain and influence the context in which
globalization happens. This happens, for example, through the governance
structures we establish and through the constellation of
stakeholders and stakeholder interests
that construct key policy debates. It
also happens through the transfer of
social norms, aspirations and ideas
that criss-cross the globe to formulate
extant and emergent social movements,
including global environmentalism.
In short, not only are the environment
and globalization intrinsically linked,
they are so deeply welded together
that we simply cannot address the
global environmental challenges facing us unless we are able to
understand and harness the dynamics of globalization that influ-ence them. By the same token, those who wish to capitalize on the
potential of globalization will not be able to do so unless they are
able to understand and address the great environmental challenges
of our time, which are part of the context within which globalization
takes place.
Table 1. Environment and globalization: some examples of interaction.
2、全球化對中國影響好壞辯論賽
開頭： 全球化是一個以經濟全球化為核心、包含各國各民族各地區在政治、文化、科技、軍事、安全、意識形態、生活方式、價值觀念等多層次、多領域的相互聯系、影響、制約的多元概念。「全球化」可概括為科技、經濟、政治、法治、管理、組織、文化、思想觀念、人際交往、國際關系十個方面的全球化。
觀點：
就全球化的必然性而言，隨著當今世界聯系的越來越緊密全球化已經成為不可忽視的一個趨勢。就全球化的必要性而言，全球化有利於每個國家之間的交流和發展。所以我方認為全球化對中國的發展是非常有好處的。
3、高分求一篇經濟全球化利與弊的英文作文。
下面是一篇經濟全球化利與弊的中英文對照的作文：
文化多樣性的減少
一、全球化會抹平社會間的多樣性，但會增加社會內部的多樣性。因為人們可供選擇的菜單增加了。想想哪個更重要。
二、多樣性是一個悖論。全球化確實會使某些局部上的多樣性減少。太多的知識會限制我們的創造力。某種程度的隔絕可以將自信和某種魔術感注入到藝術中。這種局部多樣性的減少又意味著人們可供選擇的菜單的減少。
三、這是一個「度」的問題。
First, globalization will smooth out the diversity among the community, but will increase the diversity within society. Because people increased choice of menu. Think about which is more important.
Second, diversity is a paradox. Globalization does make some partial rection of diversity. Too much knowledge will limit our creativity. Some
degree of isolation can inject a sense of confidence and a certain magic to the art. This diversity of local people to rece the mean rection in choice of menu.
Third, this is a "degree" of the problem.
傳統節日漸漸被西方節日佔領，傳統習俗的遺忘，傳統古建築在經濟的發展下不斷被拆除摧毀。
The traditional festival has graally been occupied by Western festivals, traditions and customs be forgotten, the traditional ancient buildings continue to be demolished to destroy in the development of the economy.
People in the world today are facing complicated society. Art and culture even be used to achieve the expansion. Hollywood, United States, for example, Hollywood annually proces about 700 films the Hollywood audience all over the world. In fact, the Hollywood movie has now become a tool of the United States to achieve the purposes of aggression and expansion.
文化既是民族的，又是世界的
各民族都有自己文化的個性和特徵。 各民族文化都是世界文化中不可缺少
Culture is national, but also the world's
All ethnic groups have their own culture and personality characteristics. The national culture is indispensable to world culture
Accounted for over 1/5 of the population lives in countries with the highest income levels, they have 86% of the global gross domestic proct (GDP), 82% of the global export market, 68% of the foreign direct investment, 74% of the total number of telephone; while the share of the world's populationonly about 1% of the share of 1/5 of the total number of poor in the above-mentioned items now. The difference between rich and poor countries in terms of average income, 74 times, in 1960, this gap is only 30 times. In addition, the 200 richest assets accounted for 41% of the world's total population, more than the total income.
200 millionaire property increased twice in the past four years, more than one trillion U.S. dollars, to the contrary, the daily income of less than $ poor remained at around 1.3 billion.
Globalization undoubtedly contributed to the overall growth of the world
economy, the global distribution of economic interests is disproportionate. A handful of national and multinational monopolies rules of the game and control the world market. Multinational corporations are an important driving force of economic globalization, the world's 100 largest economies, and yet there are 51 multinational companies. (2000 data) and the vast majority of multinational companies from developed countries. Seen by the state power embodied in national wealth gap is still huge. In economic output, few countries are expected to challenge the middle or even smaller instrialized countries. Even the third world to maintain the momentum of rapid development, the absolute gap can be so large that in the foreseeable future is unlikely to be eliminated.
At present, the persons concerned are to promote economic globalization on developed countries' damage theory. "However, the world economy and the greater impact of the international system is globalization has increased
inequality between countries. First, the past accumulated inequalities between countries not only failed to eliminate or mitigate a result of globalization, but growing.
Population of high-income countries account for only about 15% of the world's population, their home is the world's biological capacity by 28% but 55% of global consumption of biocapacity. This is how to achieve it?
However, political independence, economic independence they are still
nowhere in sight. International division of labor under globalization, third world countries are still at the bottom of the global instrial chain, excessive
consumption in developed countries to provide the resources and cheap labor.
An indigenous leader from the Philippines has sharply pointed out that "the so-called economic globalization, but the latest manifestation of colonialism." Colonial past is a direct plunder, colonists had to directly face the dissatisfaction of the colonists and resistance; the current economic
globalization is the scam together, the old masters and the elite conspiracy third World countries, third World countries continue to proce low-cost output, raw materials and labor (in processing, etc.), and in exchange, often and interests of the majority of unrelated or even negatively related to luxury goods and weapons and the like. "
In 1964, the world-renowned U.S. company Union Carbide in India opened a proction of pesticides farm .1975 years, finally built a large Pesticide Factory, 750 kilometers south away from the capital city of New Delhi.
In the 1984, this Pesticide Factory, liquid, highly toxic gas leakage from the tank, and lingering. The accident put 45 tons of highly toxic gas inside the tank to leak away. Only two days alone, more than 2,500 people were killed and another 60 million people affected by the poison damage of varying degrees. In 1994,The number of death has reached 6495 , there are 40,000 people dying.
Globalization the values conflict, main performance for different nationalities and countries, especially between the values of western values and non-western values of the conflict between.
And for non-western behind countries, western values and the conflict between the national values and is often and traditional values and the modem values is the process of modernization, the formation and development of the conflict between the values and intertwined, and often with the latter for intermediary.
Although "globalization" and "modernization" have different content, the former has some kind of space or geographic category of nature, it is to point to from regional to global;
While the latter has some time or historical category of nature, it is to point to from tradition to modern times, but since modern times of globalization and the whole world of modernization process is actually the same process.
It is in this process, the western capitalist countries to take the lead in realizing the
modernization of the endogenous type, according to the capitalist expansion immanent logic and with its start advantage, forced or sece non-western national identity western value, tries hard to western values, a generalized and globalization;
Some non-western countries the hand behind efforts to start or DuoCi start forced type, such as the modernization of the ZhuiGanXing exogenous type, and thus in different degree approbation west value, on the other hand, a generalized expansion in western values under the weight of national culture and appear constantly identity crisis and identity pursuit, and national cultural identity in the final analysis or for the ethnic traditional culture, especially to the core value of identity.
Therefore, in the globalization of the world modernization and basic collocated process, "" western" is no longer a geographical term but 'common code of', 'modern western' is' the symbol of modernization "universal. Through such conversion, identity 'western' into identity 'modern'."
J correspondingly, globalization china-africa western countries face behind the national values and the western the conflicts of values, often also direct the performance for the traditional values and the modem values of the conflict between.
As the expansion of the generalized to western values and fight against extreme form of response, fundamentalism was "the modern", lies in its saw and special emphasis on globalization in the modern values and the exterior-interior relationship between western values.
Also because of this, so native and outland, traditional and modern this two category and their mutual relationships become the contemporary culture study and cultural philosophy in the debate a focal point.
In the face of all these contemporary globalization in complex culture values conflict, cultural evolution in different cultural and understand that values will geographic category (native and outland) into historical category (the traditional and modern), and cultural relativism then requires the people will historical category (the traditional and modern) into geographic category (native and outlands).
Although cultural evolution and cultural relativism each has its drawbacks, of which, the former have obviously the theory of color, the latter has the cultural conservatism properties, but both see the modern globalization in different national values, especially the conflict between western values and non-western values is the conflict between the traditional values and the modem values and the conflict is profoundly intertwined with the facts, and to make a fact to own understanding and explanation.
增加是隨著經濟全球化的正常運作過程而產生的，它同時又是全球化發展不均衡的結果。 With the globalization of economy increase is the normal operation of the process and of generation, it is also the result of the unbalanced development of globalization.
全球化帶來的收益與支付的成本在不同的國家之間和一國之內不同人群之間的分配也是不均衡的。
The benefits of globalization and the cost of pay in different countries and different groups within one country between the distribution is not balanced between.
也就是說發達國家和發展中國家在全球化發展中參與游戲的角色是不同的，所獲得的利益是不
That is the developed countries and developing countries in global development in the game role is different, benefit from is not
均衡的，這樣的傾斜導致了發展中國家大量的非法移民流入發達國家
A balanced, so the tilt of the developing countries in a large number of illegal immigrants into
the developed countries
4、怎樣看待全球化對文化的影響 英語
隨著全球化時代的到來，外來文化對中國市場的強烈沖擊、西方文化大舉擴張，外國文化產品不斷擠佔中國文化市場，征服中國的文化受眾，使中國文化面臨削弱自身特色、傾向西化的現實威脅，在理論上對西方文化理論進行話語平移，在創作上對西方文化創作模式進行模仿和復制，由此甚至使西方文化對我國所進行的文化霸權得到部分實現，對當代中國民族精神產生重大的沖擊和威脅，抑制了中國文化合理功能的充分發揮。全球化給中國文化帶來的壓力還體現在中國文化進行國際參與、實現國際化發展方面的重重困難和阻力。
中國傳統文化遭遇了市場經濟的時代洗禮，導致傳統文化架構的崩潰和新的文化孕育和誕生自然經濟的可控性、自足性、低效率，與市場經濟的非控性、開放性，高效率，是根本對立的。中國文化似乎處於從沒有過的質疑、惶恐、浮躁和迷茫之中。
傳統文化生存艱難。當今世界來勢洶涌的全球文化一體化、同質化過程，其實質就是向現代西方高科技文化趨同、被西方高科技文化同化的過程。一些人對自己文化傳統的反省幾乎到了自虐的程度。幾十年來我們對自己的傳統文化批判多於繼承，否定多於肯定，缺少認真的總結，更遑論普及。很多中國傳統文化在國人的心目中的忘卻速度令人吃驚，對文化問題的質疑卻日益彌漫，中國傳統文化的主流正面臨無以為繼的危機。
歷史在演變，食物在變化，理論由發展，文藝的精典也在不斷擴大、重構和完善，傳統的審美內涵也在有著當代意識的當代人的重新闡釋下而另具新意。中國文學藝術雖然在近一百年裡深受西方文學藝術的影響，但因其固守自身規律而長期循著自身的發展邏輯，在理論方法上變化不大。經過歷史的洗禮，國人藉助西方文化研究的理論視角來分析研究世紀末和新世紀初的中國文學藝術的方法逐漸擴大。在全球化的大背景下，中國文藝正處在東西方文化互動的沖突與融合當中，中國的文學藝術理論工作者肩負歷史的重任，承擔起了繼承發展中國發展文化的重任，在理論上建構和完善中華民族的優秀文化，使之在世界大的變革之中立於不敗的地位。
中國傳統文化是具有悠久歷史的文化，為世界文化的豐富和發展做出了傑出的貢獻。在全球化文化的背景下，中國文化的發展，需要我們理性的看待自身的文化傳統，處理好民族性與時代性的關系；也需要我們理性的面對他者的文明，處理好本土文化與全球化的關系。
5、經濟全球化對發展中國家的不利影響(本人要參加辯論賽，越詳細越好)
越長越好啊……
首先，比較淺表的原因
經濟全球化使發展中國家成為發達國家的產品加工廠，並且發達國家將污染嚴重的重工業轉移至發展中國家，造成發展中國家的環境污染，所以對發展中國家不利。
其次……
算了，既然你要求越長越好，那麼你要的應該只是資料，給你轉帖一篇吧：
經濟全球化就對於發展中國家而言就是經濟侵略，你想我們鴉片戰爭後的不平等條約，除了賠款外，就是開國門自由貿易了，這就是經濟全球化啊。全球化後，大品牌的公司將工廠設在發展中國家，將發展中國家變成原料產地和勞力提供地。生產的產品返銷回去，這樣利潤就非常大了。發展中國家如果不漸進地提高民族工業，就是淪為新時期的經濟殖民地。
當然像亞洲的一些國家因為有工業基礎，同時政府也不斷發展民族工業，對外的開放也是有限制性的，得到了很多好處，比如中國。但是正如郎咸平教授說的，發達國家掌握了商品的產業鏈的絕大部分，比如品牌、物流（航運）、金融服務、資金、技術等等，發展中國家就掌握了生產這個環節，如何取得整個產業鏈的利益分配權，最後，比如100的利潤，分給我們是5，其他他們分，你說合理嗎？同時我們還要承擔環保的代價，並且他們還要通過金融來蠶食我們拿的那5的利潤，舉個例子就是97亞洲金融危機，就是發達國家對東南亞的金融攻擊。還有日本，日本的80年代經濟經濟狀況和我國現在多像啊，現在呢，怎樣了啊，已經停滯了接近10幾年了，為什麼啊，就是美歐國家對於日本進行了一次金融攻擊啊，搜索一下「日本 廣場協議」你就非常明白了。
其實經濟全球化的不利不但在於對於參與經濟全球化的國家的利益分配的不公，並且在於參與經濟全球化的國家內部人民間的利益分配不公。這是一次對於全球財富的一次重新分配，使得發達國家的富人和發展中國家的有先天條件的人（掌握權力和一些有遠見的人）都取得了非常大的利益，使得發達國家的產業工人失業增多，因為他們的工作有發展中國家的工人代替了，這樣發達國家的中產階層減少，同時發展中國家的富人更富，權貴勾結一起發達，窮人更窮（這些都是相對而言，社會財富是大量增加了的，不過分配時富人拿的更多），最終就會破壞經濟結構和社會公平，所以現在很多已經意識到了這點，主張經濟全球化的新自由主義開始沒落，美國的民主黨執政，日本的自民黨下台表明新自由主義的沒落。比如美國，奧巴馬是民主黨，支持民主黨的是中小企業和工會力量，這些都是代表中下層利益的，全球化對大的跨國公司很有利，相應的中小企業就不是很有利，所以貿易保護主義又有點抬頭了，什麼輪胎特保案啊都來了。
==========
希望對你有幫助
6、辯論賽經濟全球化利弊
開頭： 全球化是一個以經濟全球化為核心、包含各國各民族各地區在政治、文化、科技、軍事、安全、意識形態、生活方式、價值觀念等多層次、多領域的相互聯系、影響、制約的多元概念。「全球化」可概括為科技、經濟、政治、法治、管理、組織、文化、思想觀念、人際交往、國際關系十個方面的全球化。
觀點：
就全球化的必然性而言，隨著當今世界聯系的越來越緊密全球化已經成為不可忽視的一個趨勢。就全球化的必要性而言，全球化有利於每個國家之間的交流和發展。所以我方認為全球化對中國的發展是非常有好處的。
7、英語辯論演講稿
下面是我整理的英語 辯論 演講稿 ，希望對大家有幫助。
英語辯論演講稿1：
I shall at tempt to convince you that the place of women is in the home. The family is the unit of society and the mother is the center of the family. How can the family keep together if the mother is out at work all day?
The government recognizes the need for women to be in the home by giving taxation concessions for the housewife.Every year, we also celebrate Mother~ s Day with gifts and with songs and poems praising motherhood.
It can be seen that with the accelerating deterioration eviden in family life today, the time is not far distant when,with the disappearance of the family, the human race will cease to exist.
In any case, women prefer to be at home. No person really wants to work. To be able to sit at home and gossip or read is every woman's ambition. It would be a kindness to forbid women to work outside the home.
From these arguments, there can be no doubt that society is best served when women are compelled to stay at home and look after their children.
我要試圖說服大家：女人的位置是在家裡。家庭是社會的單位，而母親是家庭的中心。如果母親整天在外面工作，家庭還怎麼聚攏呢?
政府意識到婦女在家中是必不可少的，所以給家庭主婦做出減少納稅的優惠政策。每年，我們還要獻跡神上禮物、頌歌、詩詞慶祝 母親節 來贊美為母之道。
我們可以看到今天家庭生活明顯地日趨解體，過不了多久，隨著家庭的消亡，人類也將不復存在。
不清耐管怎麼說，女人還是樂意在家裡呆著。沒有人會真的想工作。能坐在家裡聊聊天，看看書是每個女人最大的願望。不允許婦女在家裡以外的地方工作真是一大恩賜。
從這些論點來看，婦女被迫呆在家裡看孩管家，受益最大的無疑是社會。
英姿正虧語辯論演講稿2：
No matter which side of the couple don't wish other side to own privacy and these will make one side feel so anguished who one side is not trusted by the other side.I think that there should not be privacy between the couple.As to say the privacy,namely the secrets which can be told to nobody and thus may be doubted with the loyalty.Under these circumstances,there should not exist privacy.As the couple are incorporated,the privacy will expose someday just like deceiving oneself.Thus must broke the emotion between the couple.Therefore,no matter which side of the couple should be lenient and stand at the position of the other side to fulfill each side,as a result,privacy won't happen.
無論夫妻哪一方肯定不希望對方有隱私，那樣感覺自己不被人信任，會很苦惱的 我覺得夫妻之間不應該有隱私，所謂隱私，既是不可告人的秘密，那一定是有被質問忠誠的嫌疑，既然如此，就不應該存在隱私。
既然夫妻以為一體，對方有隱私就如掩耳盜鈴一樣，終會有暴露的一天，那豈不是很傷感情?所以，不論是夫妻哪一方都應寬容大度，對對方提的問題要站在對方的立場上，盡量滿足，所以也就不會在有隱私發生。
英語辯論演講稿3：
Good morning， chairman, Ladies and gentlemen, my dear debaters. For the proposition that emigration trend is good or bad for the development of china. Emigration indicates people who leave their own country to go and live permanently in another country, here including Chinese go out and other foreign come to china.
As we all know that emigration has become a trend because of the globalization.
Our side firmly believes that emigration trend is good for the development of china. There are four reasons to support our point.
1引進外資，促進中國經濟的發展中國國內有3000多萬歸僑僑眷，海外有幾千萬華人華僑，此為中國經濟發展的一大優勢。據不完全統計，改革開放以來，僑資佔中國吸收外資總額的70%左右，海外華僑華人向中國公益事業捐款達400億元人民幣，僅2005年中國接受的海外移民匯款便達213億美元，世界排名僅次於印度
First of all, it can bring foreign investment in order to promote China's economic development. There are over 30 million returned overseas Chinese and thousands of Chinese all over the world. They are introcing foreign investment, promoting the development of china’s economy and it became a strong advantage to the Chinese economy. Since reform and opening up, the overseas investment is about 70% of total foreign investment. The donation from returned overseas Chinese is about 40 billion Yuan. In 2005, the money donated from overseas is more than $ 21.3 billion, rank only second to India in the world.2 引進國外高新科技 提高自主創新能力，從而提高綜合國力。
自主創新已被公認為推動企業、國家經濟發展的主要動力來源。 上海市人大代表李逸平說：“提倡自主創新，並不是說全部從頭開始，完全依靠自己的力量，而是強調在開放前提下的創新。能夠跟外國先進技術嫁接的，我們可以在引進之後進行集成創新。而引進國外高新科技的最終目的就是實現自主創新。
自主創新讓企業迸發出驚人的力量。上海著名的上海振華港口機械(集團)股份有限公司，憑借20多項領先世界的核心技術，已經連續多年占據全球市場的大半江山， 30萬美元起家的微創醫療器械公司，研發 出國 內第一個具有完全自主知識產權的冠脈葯物支架，首次進入壟斷的日歐市場。Secondly, it can Introce foreign higher technology, promote the independent creativity, and improve comprehensive national power.Independent creativity is known as the main driving force to the economic development. Li nipin, NPC member in Shanghai, said, ‘’we call for independent creativity not means do everything from beginning and just by ourselves’ power, we can use foreign higher technology to help reach the final goal that independent creativity become the reality. 3.引進國外的人才到中國，促進中國發展
中國外專局局長季允石透露，2011年中國大力引進國外高層次人才和緊缺人才。要大力引進國外先進 種植 、養殖技術和生產經營方式，提升中國農業發展水平。著力引進發展先進裝備製造、企業技術改造和現代服務業等方面的高層次人才。推廣低炭技術，重點引進控制溫室氣體排放、資源有效利用和綠色節能等方面的外國專家。
中國外專局提供的數據顯示，5年來，中國共引進境外專家230萬人次，其中經濟領域約159.6萬人次，教科文衛和其他社會發展領域約69.6萬人次，為中國經濟的全面發展增添了動力。
Thirdly, it can introce foreign talent to China in order to develop our country.季允石 Ji Yunshi, The director general of SAFEA(外專局)said that, China introced the high level foreign talent and shortage talented person in 2011. In 2012 China continue to introce the foreign talent to inject new ideas and high technology for improving our agriculture, instry and service.
The data of SAFEA s in recent 5 years, china had introced 2300000 foreign experts.159600 of these experts are in the economic area and 69600 are in science, ecation culture and health area. These foreign talents bring power to Chinese economy.
4.把中國優秀 文化 弘揚到國外華僑華人通過遍及世界的中餐館傳播中華美食，通過會館社團傳播儒家思想，通過興建華文學校、創辦華文報刊、出版華文書籍將中國語言文學傳播異域。華僑華人實為中華 傳統文化 的載體與傳播者。
中國政府真的不需要過於憂慮，首先移民是一個全球化的趨勢，即使他人不在中國，同樣可以宣傳中國文化，以蔡志忠為例，他是台灣知名的漫畫家，現在生活在加拿大，但他仍然在中國發表作品;其次中國、加拿大兩國交替地生活更利於傳遞文化，范立欣到加拿大後有了更廣闊的視野，如今回到中國拍攝的作品有其獨特的風格，這對中國來說是好事;最後我要說的是移民後更便於他們傳播中國文化。”last but not least, the oversea Chinese can spread our Chinese culture to the foreigners by living in the foreign country. Most of the oversea Chinese run some Chinese restaurants, so they can spread the Chinese food in this way. Our government doesn’t need to worry about it too much, and emigration has become global trend, although Chinese emigrations are not in china, but they used their own way to make contribution to china. Take caizhong –a famous cartoonist of Taiwan as an example, now he is in Canada, but he still published his works in china. And that is good for communication of culture.
That is all we want to say. Thank you..
富人移民，除了能夠開啟高質量的生活，追求更高層次的物質精神文明，同時，絕大多數移民者本身僅僅是獲得一個海外通行證，主要的工作和事業還是集中在中國。畢竟，當前中國的高速發展，具備的廣闊機遇空間，已經吸引大量的外籍人士以及海外華僑到中國投資創業，所以，富人即使移民到海外，發展的重心還是在中國。對於移民者而言，既獲取了移民身份，開啟高層生活，又實現了投資盈利，更重要的是，為祖國的經濟金融穩定做出了積極的貢獻。總之，中國的富人移民，實際上在更大程度上實現了個人價值和社會價值的有機統一，除了能夠提高自己的層次地位，更重要的是，為中國的經濟發展作出積極貢獻!
對於“精英”和“新富階層”移民，用“人才流動”比用“人才流失”形容更為准確。出國移民所導致的“人才流失”其實並沒有 傳說 中的那麼誇張。移民中，有一些人才原本就沒有流出，大部分事業的重心仍然在中國;而海外 留學 和工作的海歸人才，事實“迴流”的比例在提升。據 教育 部網站數據顯示，各類留學回國人員總數目前有一半留學生是選擇學成之後回國發展。“現在迴流非常明顯。與其中國的高等院校是美國大學的出國預備基地，我們為什麼不把美國包括其他教育發達的國家，當作我們中國的博士或博士後的培養基地呢 ”移民專家認為，應該以一種更加開放的理念對待出國留學和移民。
“絕對是目前世界上數量最大、損失最多的人才流失國”。
就絕對規模而言，中國人才的外流數量的確稱冠全球，可這首先是因為中國人口基數龐大。評價一種人口趨勢，我們需要觀察目標群體及其對應總體的關系。這就好比估算一個分數，要看分子，也要看分母。利用世界銀行發布的最新數據，法國學者多克爾(Frédéric Docquier)等人計算了各國人口流入發達國家的比率。他們發現，2000年以前，僅有3.1%受過高等教育的中國人在22歲後遷移到了發達國家。中國的人才外流率在193個國家中位居第158位，同樣是人口大國的印度還略高於中國(3.4%)。幾十個非洲和拉美國家的外流率都在20%以上，它們才是發展經濟學家關注的“問題國家”。